- An attempt at found footage horror,
yet again.
For my last review in October, I felt
it appropriate that I review a movie that at least was supposed to be
scary and of course there will always be some studios that feel their
movie is the most Halloween-spirited even though they contain nothing
remotely having to do with the special occasion. As you may already
know, there were two big Halloween contenders this year. Paranormal
Activity 4 and new kid on the block Sinister; who was brought to you
by the people who originally gave us the aforementioned Paranormal
series, so not really as new as one would hope.
The movie has a pretty slow start and
has too much of a lull in the build up. This is normal with the
Paranormal series, however. It wasn't really until Paranormal
Activity 3 that it had built up enough steam for me to even think it
was tense. I had hoped that Sinister might at least draw me in a
little quicker and if not maybe give me two chills? I wasn't much
surprised by the quite slow start but giving credit where credit is
due, there are enough cheap thrills in this movie (especially in the
last quarter) to put it ahead of all the other Paranormal Activity
movies I've seen.
Moving on, the plot follows a true
crime novelist Ellison Oswalt (played by Ethan Hawke) and his family, his
wife (played by Juliet Rylance) and their two children, the sweet innocent girl
(played by Clare Foley) who paints unicorns on her bedroom wall and the troubled
youth son (played by Michael Hall D'Addario) who has night terrors. Not much of a
description to the kids but to be honest Ellison is the main
attraction. He really carries the movie along. I'd even go so far as
to say that if you don't like him (for whatever reason), Sinister
isn't really going to be your cup of tea because he holds just about
every scene together.
The first half of the movie mostly
played out like a bad mystery show on late night cable. Right up
until Ellison catches a glimpse of Mr. Magoo in some Super 8 film
that he found in his attic of a group of murders. Before I go on,
those of you who saw it are saying “Uh he isn't called Mr. Magoo”
and those of you who did not see it are asking “He isn't really
called Mr. Magoo is he?” You're right he isn't but the first time
they did say his proper name I was pretty sure they said Magoo, so it
stuck for me. Those of you who are sticklers for proper names
however can call him Bughuul. He's a decent “villain” in that he
doesn't say much, he's pretty weird looking (though ultimately most
people think he looks like he is from Slipknot) and it's assumed he
eats children. I find knowing little detail about the killer is
scarier than if the audience knows their whole back-story. Just a
taste of what he looks like, what he does and how he operates is more
chilling and effective to me. So until one scene that I thought was
weak I think he's a pretty solid force and I wouldn't be surprised to
see him return but I don't want them to explain more about him. Look
at Michael Myers after they started explaining his back story more
and more.
You may not know it, but these are aptly named. |
I give the movie a 7/10
PS: I polled some people, and they all
said if they heard a noise in the night at worst step 4 would be to
turn on some lights.
Damn you for exposing my baby-eating scheme! I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for that blasted Ethan Hawke!
ReplyDelete